Missing large

OldCoal Free

Comics I Follow

All of your followed comic titles will appear here.

For help on how to follow a comic title, click here

Recent Comments

  1. about 23 hours ago on Brian McFadden

    Actually, his desire was to staff the new Cabinet openings with more FAUX SNOOZE stars.


  2. about 23 hours ago on Clay Jones

    Trump has become an ongoing constitutional crisis. It’s perfectly obvious that Trump intends to shut down the Russian investigation by any means possible.

    It’s also perfectly obvious, to anyone with the brains of a turnip, that Trump is afraid that examining his organization’s books will reveal proof of what has been reported several times, that his organization was trying hard to get property and loans to build hotels in Moscow.



    Ok, so it’s nothing if he actually put his name on papers that started such a process, say, in May or June of 2016, right? That’s the right wing argument, and OH BOY, is it wrong.


    If Trump’s organization violated the sanctions on Russia in 2016, and if Trump’s signature is on a document that Mueller can find, then Trump personally broke the law, deliberately. Trump doesn’t want that to come out – he’d still be in zero danger of successful impeachment, but he’d most certainly be in danger of this being too much for even his base to swallow.

    Even our cons would have a hard time squaring “signing deals with Russians that were against the law” and “I had no contacts with Russians”.

    And that’s why Trump is in panic mode.

  3. about 24 hours ago on Steve Breen

    This wouldn’t even be a discussion, if people would vote in the primary.

  4. 1 day ago on Jack Ohman

    Now see, there’s a major mistake you made in the first sentence:

    “with largely no impact on the way the right-wing views women”.

    You aren’t going to change the way the right wing views women, that would be changing their entire identity. The sex harassment complaints have not changed the right wing view a whit. They just went along to beat on Democrats, then KEPT THEIR GUYS IN OFFICE WHILE SENDING MONEY AND SUPPORT TO ROY MOORE!

    There is nothing there that is going to change at all, in any but a very transient way. But you THINK they can change. And that’s a problem with you. They can’t change and hold power, because the wimps will get voted out and new “manly men” put in. Thinking they can change is the problem liberals have with cons, we keep thinking they’ll change.

    From tearing the country apart with the Civil War, to the riots in 1920, to the repeated murders and attempts to suppress civil rights in any way possible, abandoning parties when they had to, jumping ship and throwing anyone and everyone under the bus, they have kept exactly the same attitudes from day one. And they’ll tell you in a heartbeat that those attitudes are ordained by God, and I can show you a thousand websites where they make that claim every hour on the hour.

    You CANNOT change the cons. You can only outvote them, and realize they are what they are. If they give up on running a manly man, and run a “race traitor wimp”, don’t imagine for an instant that they’ve changed, they’re just biding their time and planning to stab that guy in the back ASAP. As they did the Bush family. Who were pretty bad, but not the full monty that Trump has on display.

  5. 1 day ago on Jack Ohman

    Dude, complaining that the DNC didn’t like your candidate means nothing at all. THE DNC DOES NOT CONTROL WHO THE VOTERS PICK!All they can do is withhold their money. And that isn’t usually that much.Go find out something about how politics really works, because you keep announcing, loudly, that you really haven’t got a clue.

  6. 1 day ago on Michael Ramirez

    I’m starting to wonder if Chev IS Trumpkins, any time he makes any statement, you can flip over to FAUX and see the headline he picked it from.

  7. 1 day ago on Michael Ramirez

    I’m starting to wonder if Chev IS Trumpkins, any time he makes any statement, you can flip over to FAUX and see the headline he picked it from.

  8. 1 day ago on Michael Ramirez

    Gotta give it to him, he’s got a lot of “firsts”. Maybe not the ones any sane person would want, but whatever.

  9. 1 day ago on Glenn McCoy

    In case the rest of you don’t get it, and you seem to be treating this charlatan with some respect, he’s taking advantage of a liberal weakness, intellectual speculation about “might have beens”.


    Which is ludicrous high school sophomore nonsense that no debate club would allow.

  10. 1 day ago on Glenn McCoy

    Ah, yes, I’m well aware of your “arguments”. You pass it down from on high and everyone else is wrong. All the while boasting of your vast intellectual superiority.

    Yawn. You don’t even slightly impress me with your “you don’t know” this and that. Yup, lot of BS I don’t want to know. Much of it yours.

    That Clinton love child nonsense is utterly unproven. Speculation about “KENNEDY WAS GUNNA START NUKLAR WARRE” is just nonsense again, he didn’t so claiming he was going to is simply unwarranted speculation and third hand gossip. As is the rest of the history rewriting you seem to enjoy.