Recent Comments

1. 1 minute ago on Clay Bennett

   And should be in both trump and biden’s hands – did you see donny calling RFK jr. names yesterday (or perhaps the day before) – he realizes that some Republicans may vote for a conspiracy theorist other than himself.

2. 5 minutes ago on Al Goodwyn Editorial Cartoons

   Originality isn’t your thing, I see.

3. 9 minutes ago on Al Goodwyn Editorial Cartoons

   I’m surprised by your self awareness. But you do have your bad points . . .

4. 10 minutes ago on Al Goodwyn Editorial Cartoons

   It wasn’t surprising, though, given MT’s delusional take on the world.

5. 13 minutes ago on Michael Ramirez

   Nope.I only call people out when they are wrong. And AF is clearly wrong and severely biased about several things in his initial post. But I know you are still butt hurt from when I corrected you. As Captain Mal Reynolds (Firefly) said when accused of acting better than everyone else: “Nope. Just the ones I’m better than.”

6. 15 minutes ago on Michael Ramirez

   That is a questionable statement about population loss. Let us first look at the immediate history: “From 2010 to 2020, California’s population grew by 5.8% (or 2.4 million), according to decennial census counts.” Then, the estimated loss: “California lost 433,000 people between July 2020 and July 2023. Most of the loss occurred during the first year of the pandemic and was driven by a sharp rise in residents moving to other states. But fewer births, higher deaths, and lower international migration also played a role.” And then the recovery (the April 2024 estimate): “The nation’s most populous state is growing again, ending a trend of population decline that had dogged Gov. Gavin Newsom through much of his tenure. California gained just over 67,000 people last year, the first increase since 2019, according to an estimate released Tuesday by the state Department of Finance.” So, you see, the endless repetition of the “people are leaving California in droves” is nothing more than a simplistic view, probably spouted by Hannity and other “deep” thinkers.

7. about 21 hours ago on Chip Bok

   lol. He’s too smart? That really wouldn’t be my first thought reading your nonsense. And you do seem to refuse to do the research suggested so that you may learn something. I guess No New Wars had to do the research for you, as usual. You’re either incurious or lazy – either way, not a good look and not suggesting intelligence.

8. about 21 hours ago on Gary Varvel

   You sound like you’re on drugs. In fact, if you believe that trump nonsense about joe’s drugs, then you may be outright delusional. Was it you that suggested the cocaine left in the WH visitors area was from Hunter?

9. about 21 hours ago on Gary Markstein

   MT has no idea what she would be up against in an insult contest with a New Yorker . . .

10. 1 day ago on Michael Ramirez

    Again, you are wrong. The judges must consider standing when they consider the case. The fact that you are ignorant of that fact doesn’t mean it is worthless. Our judicial system has survived hundreds of years without you and will continue despite your contrary opinions. The claims about what was on the Hunter laptop have been discredited and the polls relying on that nonsense are themselves not to be taken seriously. And Pa.’s change in voting requirements was not illegal, according to the Supreme Court. So get your story straight pal.