Let’s get specific. A ban on assault weapons, such as the one used in this killing and in many others. That’s not taking guns away from hunters, or from people who think that a gun in the house will protect them. It won’t prevent all the killings, but it will do something. I’m sure the courts would allow such a ban. Can anyone explain why this isn’t a good idea?
Let’s get specific. A ban on assault weapons, such as the one used in this killing and in many others. That’s not taking guns away from hunters, or from people who think that a gun in the house will protect them. It won’t prevent all the killings, but it will do something. I’m sure the courts would allow such a ban. Can anyone explain why this isn’t a good idea?