Murry has talent, no doubt. However, if the Cardinals hierarchy actually held that he has to be contractually obligated in order for him to study his opponents for upcoming games (though the clause was later rescinded,) what further evidence do you require to show that Murry may not be the one to lead the Cardinals to the Promised Land?
Reminiscent of a famous “The Far Side” cartoon by Gary Larson. The cartoon showed a polar bear breaking into the top of an igloo saying to another polar bear, “Oh hey! I just love these things! … Crunchy on the outside and a chewy center!”
A guy walked past a hot dog stand offering hot dogs at $1000 each. The passerby said to the hot dog stand owner, “At those prices you must not sell many hot dogs.” The owner replied, “No, but if I sell one I’m through for the day.”
Sid just doesn’t understand that this is a buyer’s market. There will always be some assistant coach who will want a “chance” to prove himself. (Good luck with that at Walden. God Himself would experience difficulty producing a winner there.)
Murry has talent, no doubt. However, if the Cardinals hierarchy actually held that he has to be contractually obligated in order for him to study his opponents for upcoming games (though the clause was later rescinded,) what further evidence do you require to show that Murry may not be the one to lead the Cardinals to the Promised Land?