There you go again. You make a couple of “observations” that no one could argue with, and then set up a straw man, promptly defeat it and then declare victory. You have listened to so many Republican talking points that you can’t approach someone else’s opinion with an open mind. In my case, you don’t even know what my opinion is. And what does believing or not believing in gods have to do with it?
You’re using a logical fallacy. You say that just because we shouldn’t cling slavishly to one (or some) ideas of someone who lived a few hundred years ago, we should reject everything they thought. Or rather, you’re accusing me of thinking that. It seems you think just because someone you disagree with wants to be willing to re-evaluate ideas and “look to the future”, it must be wrong. Oh, and changing the subject (the subject was gun regulation) is a cheap rhetorical trick.
It doesn’t seem like anything has been “updated” today. When I checked a few hours ago I thought it was just slow.