She is speaking with the therapist. And like all dogs, she is using body language. I hope the therapist is paying attention rather than focusing on the note.
Lots of prejudging here. We don’t have the facts. Maybe never will. We only know what the media wants us to know. Generally it is best to avoid judging unless you’ve never made a mistake.
Lots of prejudgement here. We do not have the facts. Maybe never will. The information we have is what the media decides they want us to have. Yes, we can opine. But one could wisely suggest we not throw stones if we have never made a mistake. We can learn how to better handle the next event be it from gun, vehicle, knife, bomb, or whatever is chosen as a weapon.
No. You obviously haven’t read it. Not too long although longer than a comic. It’s about parental rights. Feel free to educate yourself with something other than the lies the media is selling.
Sadly, most of the commentators here are unfamiliar with what was presented in the trial. No point in letting facts get in the way have a good rant. At the adults, police, in this story done their job, he would not have had to take the role he did.
Her answers were outstanding. The buffoons who asked a judge to give a legal response before a case obviously don’t understand the concept of bias. E.g. RGB (may she RIP) prejudiced any future decisions involving President Trump with her public comments and should’ve recused herself in cases involving anything the president was advocating. The justices have a special and difficult role in the U.S. government and need to avoid prejudgments such as the inquisitors were demanding. I know this view isn’t popular but, to preserve our justice system, it needs to be addressed.
She is speaking with the therapist. And like all dogs, she is using body language. I hope the therapist is paying attention rather than focusing on the note.