Holden Awn Free

Recent Comments

  1. 2 days ago on Calvin and Hobbes

    Calvin, you are not alone, lots of people find ourselves in that same conundrum these days.

  2. 2 days ago on Tim Campbell

    I sincerely hope the Dems have savvy enough to ditch Kamala from the ticket and select a competent VP candidate, because IF Joe runs – and wins – his chances of lasting another 4 years appear to be slim.

  3. 2 days ago on Al Goodwyn Editorial Cartoons

    I’m always perplexed as to why anyone would take political – or relationship – advice from a Hollywood celebrity.

  4. 3 days ago on Lisa Benson

    Exactly – in games, an over qualified player using deception to lure another in in hopes of eventually revealing their true skills to realize a gain. A pool hustler comes to mind. It’s also a poker term (I played regularly for over a dozen years) for one who checks on one round then raises on the next, “a deceptive play in poker where a player bets weakly or passively with a strong holding…” to lure unsure players in or cause them to bet more strongly. In Joe’s case , his sandbagging deception is presenting himself – with the assistance of others – as more qualified than he is in order to remain in an office he has.

  5. 3 days ago on Lisa Benson

    “Sandbaggers deceive others about their real intentions or abilities, or otherwise use deception to gain something.” – Vocabulary.com

  6. 3 days ago on Liberty Meadows

    No worries, Frank, stand near Jen and no rain will fall on your head.

  7. 3 days ago on Bloom County

    Fun to see how many readers / commenters clearly demonstrate they have no clue what a slide rule is.

  8. 4 days ago on Liberty Meadows

    ’Spent much of my college career looking for a girl like that…unsuccessfully, I might add…

  9. 5 days ago on Lisa Benson

    Oh, Joe’s a sandbagger all right.

  10. 8 days ago on Scott Stantis

    Nixon was never charged with any crime, nor did he actually commit the botched burglary — he covered up for henchmen who did the deed. That would have left him vulnerable to impeachment. I would interpret this recent SC ruling as saying that Nixon would not be vulnerable to criminal indictment for being an accessory to a crime until after impeachment conviction or other removal from office, and then it would depend on whether his action was seen as being an ‘official act’.