Recent Comments

1. 18 days ago on Pearls Before Swine

   I go a step further, and log out of my Google account on my Android phone. Maps still work, Play Store does not (I log back in twice a year for app updates).

2. 19 days ago on Herman

   I was thinking it would be hard as a rock, or at least rock like!

3. about 1 month ago on The Argyle Sweater

   Reminds me of the book: “Yellow River” by I.P. Daily

4. 2 months ago on Luann

   All I really remember is the Treasure Map inked across the two ladies butts. I was in my 20s, and thought that was something??? (I remember it, but do not remember why I remember it… old!!!)

5. 2 months ago on Luann

   “Lust in the Dust” was a funny western movie back in the 1980s. IMDB gives it a 5.9, so not terrible!

6. 3 months ago on Herman

   Birds? Maybe it is the Wife’s hands up, with her head out of picture and she is mocking him with hand puppets???

7. 3 months ago on Doonesbury

   The US problems with IVF started much earlier than “W”. A 1973 attempt in the US was shutdown, and the researcher left the institution. The Wiki article does not explain the why. IVF was perfected in England, and came to the US when people who wanted to get pregnant said hey, we want that!!!

   First IVF baby in the UK, 1978, first baby in the US 1987, nine years behind Socialized Medicine. Makes you wonder about that “Greatest Healthcare in the World” claim???

   en.wikipedia.ORG/wiki/History_of_in_vitro_fertilisation

8. 3 months ago on Michael Ramirez

   “Social security is a self funded program” this was not always the case (yes it was mostly supposed to be), Reagan and the 1983 changes took SS “Off Budget”, before that it was just another line item in the overall USA Budget (Reagan was also the one that started taxing SS Benefits in 1983)

   en.wikipedia.ORG/wiki/History_of_Social_Security_in_the_United_States

9. 3 months ago on Speed Bump

   replace “there” with “their”

10. 3 months ago on Speed Bump

    There are Recycling Symbols on lots of plastic (almost all), unfortunately #1, #2 are the only ones easily recyclable! The others are much more expensive, and end up in the landfill, or power generation. So why do recycling programs collect the other types? Because people are more likely to recycle 1 and 2 if they can just throw all the stuff in the same bin without caring about the number! Also it makes people feel good to not throw plastic in the garbage, but to “think” they are recycling it!!!

    Also while the numbers do indicate the type of plastic, each manufacture has there own formula i.e., all #5s are not the same chemical formula.