They seem not to have any evidence of criminal activity that will stick to him. Lots of drama, as when yesterday a staffer told of smashed crockery, yelling, and grabbing the limo’s steering wheel, but all the criminal behavior was by his lawyers and other staffers.
It’s a way to seem “bipartisan” while actually being DINOs.
That one really is a little confusing. Banks rob us, so how can it be wrong to rob them?
I wonder whether Ukraina’s army has more, per capita, than ours.
Visitors to the USA should be warned on arrival about their chances of being shot.
Very low, judging from my experience. I’ve been here for a very large part of my 82 years, surely more than the cumulative total of dozens if not thousands of visitors, yet haven’t been shot even once. Should I feel insulted?
and once again: what would your “more moderate” politics look like operationally?
It’s what keeps her going.
I found the intermediate one: it was issued by Bush the Lesser as EO 13292, further amending 12958. Section 1.7 reads:
1.7.a In no case shall information be classified in order to: (1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error; (2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency; (3) restrain competition; or (4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.
Since the crime was committed in 2007, this is the applicable EO.
We’d have to successfully primary just about every incumbent regardless of nominal party affiliation.
If you’re not on the inside already, or have excess billions to hand out as bribes, you might as well be living in a shack in the Cambodian mountains, living on yams and pigs.
by the way, the republicans are radical, not conservative
You probably meant “reactionary, not conservative”. “Radical” typically refers to the left, the ones who want to “strike at the root [radix]” of the situation.