Don’t know about you, but I don’t have anywhere near $100MM in net worth. Estimates are that the tax would affect about 11,000 people in the entire country.
It applies only to individuals with at least $100 million in wealth who do not pay at least a 25% tax rate on their income (inclusive of unrealized capital gains). Payments can be spread out over subsequent years.
Within that $100 million club, you’d only pay taxes on unrealized capital gains if at least 80% of your wealth is in tradeable assets (i.e., not shares of private startups or real estate). One caveat for this illiquid group is that there would be a deferred tax of up to 10% on unrealized capital gains upon exit.
Wouldn’t tax the value of real estate. And I think it likely that, once you’d paid taxes on unrealized capital gains, the affected gains would be treated as “realized” for purposes of following years.
Moreover, the plan is limited to households worth more than $100 million (per the smartasset website):
“One issue in this plan has captured specific attention: a new tax on unrealized capital gains. Biden, and now Harris, have proposed levying an annual tax on the static wealth of households worth more than $100 million. Specifically, households worth more than $100 million would pay an annual minimum tax worth 25% of their combined income and unrealized capital gains.”
Not true. According to materials regarding the passage of the Federal minimum wage laws available at Cornell Law School’s website: “FLSA was a comprehensive federal scheme which provided for minimum wages, overtime pay, record keeping requirements, and child labor regulations. The purpose of the minimum wage was to stabilize the post-depression economy and protect the workers in the labor force. The minimum wage was designed to create a minimum standard of living to protect the health and well-being of employees.”
No, the point of VAT is to include it in the total. 2 + 2 = 5 is more like adding sales tax AFTER you’ve totaled the prices.