Recent Comments

1. about 4 hours ago on Non Sequitur

   Thanks.

   Going to answer the question?

2. about 4 hours ago on Prickly City

   You know that every time you respond to the sad little troll it just gives it more incentive to touch itself. Eww.

3. 1 day ago on Non Sequitur

   Apparently your ability to reason hinges on whether or not it’s to your advantage to do so.

   You say that “National defense and law enforcement should cover most of it” as what, in your opinion, is “essential” to secure your rights. Do you not think that there is anything else worth paying taxes for?

   In the meantime, Merry Christmas, or whatever holiday you might choose to observe. :-)

4. 1 day ago on Prickly City

   The idiot doesn’t care that you actually answered the question. Just responding to the clown lets it touch itself.

5. 2 days ago on Non Sequitur

   I will, after you answer the question I asked first.

   “So, you don’t make use of anything that the government does, that doesn’t secure your ‘rights’?”

6. 2 days ago on Non Sequitur

   So, you don’t make use of anything that the government does, that doesn’t secure your “rights”?

7. 2 days ago on Non Sequitur

   Only if you wish to live in a hut.

   Do you make use of any of the things that the present U.S. (and local) government does for you that aren’t “national defense and law enforcement”?

8. 2 days ago on Non Sequitur

   Your reply states a goal of what they think government should be. Now you just need to determine what is essential to reach those goals.

9. 2 days ago on Non Sequitur

   Name somebody that doesn’t.

   The problem is determining what the “essentials” are.

   Your reply to cracker65 doesn’t take into account the fact that the states with the highest percentage of those who collect “government assistance” are Republican majority. With that in mind, I suspect that you “suspect” incorrectly. :-)

10. 2 days ago on Non Sequitur

    Then why increase taxes by imposing tariffs? You know, the point of the cartoon.

    Why is it so hard for the Right to understand these things?