Too bad Mitt isn’t under the same scrutiny as the public, under REPUBLICAN movements, like well, “Patriot Act”, and other invasions. Obama SHOULD end some of the abuse, but he didn’t write it into law. The Constitution doesn’t actually guarantee “privacy”, but it DOES list “Secure” from invasion by the state without warrant. (Which, there IS still some residual debate on what THAT means, because of a transcription issue, but. . .)
Too bad Mitt isn’t under the same scrutiny as the public, under REPUBLICAN movements, like well, “Patriot Act”, and other invasions. Obama SHOULD end some of the abuse, but he didn’t write it into law. The Constitution doesn’t actually guarantee “privacy”, but it DOES list “Secure” from invasion by the state without warrant. (Which, there IS still some residual debate on what THAT means, because of a transcription issue, but. . .)