Sigh, church, we’re talking about scottf feeling more free by the day to say things like “women and non-white males should not be able to vote” without one single comment from righties like you. But you will call me to task in your comments. Even after Norm agreed and added to the sexual innuendo, it still be just harmless in your mind. Cuz?
Don’t start throwing off-topic vague “you do it too!” comments around.
The subject is the sound of crickets from righties on this thread in regards to allowing scottf to vomit as he claims to represent those like you. If each person stands 100% on his or her own in each and every post, how does it make a conversation? It doesn’t. We respond to each other. How come you don’t respond to scottf?
When parker says “we” object, he means those on this thread who find it offensive. Re-read Scott’s words in my first paragraph. How do you not get racism and misogyny
out of that? Not an entire party, but individuals that make up a conversation, a community, and ultimately a nation.
Sigh, church, we’re talking about scottf feeling more free by the day to say things like “women and non-white males should not be able to vote” without one single comment from righties like you. But you will call me to task in your comments. Even after Norm agreed and added to the sexual innuendo, it still be just harmless in your mind. Cuz?
Don’t start throwing off-topic vague “you do it too!” comments around.
The subject is the sound of crickets from righties on this thread in regards to allowing scottf to vomit as he claims to represent those like you. If each person stands 100% on his or her own in each and every post, how does it make a conversation? It doesn’t. We respond to each other. How come you don’t respond to scottf?
When parker says “we” object, he means those on this thread who find it offensive. Re-read Scott’s words in my first paragraph. How do you not get racism and misogyny out of that? Not an entire party, but individuals that make up a conversation, a community, and ultimately a nation.