My wife and I are both pro-choice and agree on women’s rights, but we are somewhat baffled by the number of abortions when the morning-after pill is 95% effective, available to anyone, costs less than $3 and free to many. It seems reasonable to use the m-a pill first and only undergo the trauma of an abortion for extreme cases. What are we missing here?
My wife and I are both pro-choice and agree on women’s rights, but we are somewhat baffled by the number of abortions when the morning-after pill is 95% effective, available to anyone, costs less than $3 and free to many. It seems reasonable to use the m-a pill first and only undergo the trauma of an abortion for extreme cases. What are we missing here?