This is stupid. We already consider motive in sentencing. A crime against someone solely because of their race, religion, orientation, etc., is actually a crime meant to instill fear in others of the same characteristics. Which is terrorism, plain and simple. Why is Bok against tougher penalties on terrorists?
This is stupid. We already consider motive in sentencing. A crime against someone solely because of their race, religion, orientation, etc., is actually a crime meant to instill fear in others of the same characteristics. Which is terrorism, plain and simple. Why is Bok against tougher penalties on terrorists?