What splendid ignorance of history. The opposition to Bork centered on his judicial philosophy, not his personal behavior, and while some of the rhetoric was overblown (on both sides) in retrospect there should be little doubt the dispute was legitimate.
What splendid ignorance of history. The opposition to Bork centered on his judicial philosophy, not his personal behavior, and while some of the rhetoric was overblown (on both sides) in retrospect there should be little doubt the dispute was legitimate.