This entire thing reminds me of something. Before the lady who is refusing to do the website because of her religious convictions is taken seriously, someone should ask if she wears clothing made of two threads, is perhaps divorced, or eats shellfish. If the answer to any of that is yes… she should lose her case because of hypocrisy. There should also be a background check mad to know if she was a virgin until marriage. Either she REALLY follows the religion, or she is cherry-picking what suits her own special attitudes, and religious injunctions can be ignored based only on personal convenience. Cherry picking which part of your religion you will follow, and then using that same religion for a pretext for bigotry should not be sanctioned by anyone, least of all a Supreme Court which almost certainly also cherry-picks their religious attitudes…
This entire thing reminds me of something. Before the lady who is refusing to do the website because of her religious convictions is taken seriously, someone should ask if she wears clothing made of two threads, is perhaps divorced, or eats shellfish. If the answer to any of that is yes… she should lose her case because of hypocrisy. There should also be a background check mad to know if she was a virgin until marriage. Either she REALLY follows the religion, or she is cherry-picking what suits her own special attitudes, and religious injunctions can be ignored based only on personal convenience. Cherry picking which part of your religion you will follow, and then using that same religion for a pretext for bigotry should not be sanctioned by anyone, least of all a Supreme Court which almost certainly also cherry-picks their religious attitudes…