I don’t see how he didn’t create a paradox by going back and not using the see and say on Dudley. Wouldn’t that null his go-yo? After all without turning Sir Dudley into a frog he may not have gotten the idea to break the see and say and make the go-yo
I don’t see how he didn’t create a paradox by going back and not using the see and say on Dudley. Wouldn’t that null his go-yo? After all without turning Sir Dudley into a frog he may not have gotten the idea to break the see and say and make the go-yo