Fair enough. Let’s say Martin managed to turn the gun around before the trigger was pulled and Zimmerman had been killed with his own gun, with only Martin’s testimony about what happened. Who comes out the bad guy then? Who would the press favor, or the court system? Would Zimmerman be a concerned citizen who got killed defending his neighborhood, or would you accept Trayvon’s testimony about him following him around with a gun? These are genuine questions, not partisan accusations. With no third party witnesses, we only have the testimony of the survivor as to what really happened. Would Trayvon have had the same supporters Zimmerman had, or would the public still be divided along the same lines?
Fair enough. Let’s say Martin managed to turn the gun around before the trigger was pulled and Zimmerman had been killed with his own gun, with only Martin’s testimony about what happened. Who comes out the bad guy then? Who would the press favor, or the court system? Would Zimmerman be a concerned citizen who got killed defending his neighborhood, or would you accept Trayvon’s testimony about him following him around with a gun? These are genuine questions, not partisan accusations. With no third party witnesses, we only have the testimony of the survivor as to what really happened. Would Trayvon have had the same supporters Zimmerman had, or would the public still be divided along the same lines?