I will respond, point by point. All office holders and would be office holders claim to support the rule of law; most don’t bribe attorneys general.I’ve never heard anyone claim to support trade deals that do not favor the US; whether the deal is good for us or not can be determined only in the future.We are the superpower; supporting other countries that cannot pay us back is frequently in our national interest. What if you are too sick, poor, or just in a run of really bad luck? Forget about them?Does that include endless occupation, or just finding out if the sand can glow? A very simplistic argument.So, we explode the deficit or cut massively. I anxiously await his delineation of the cuts.It is intuitively obviously to even a dim observer that the government has a tremendous impact on the economy, and it can be for good or ill. Does he believe government ALWAYS impedes economic growth? That would imply he knows very little history. It is true, of course, that the recent republican growth has greatly impeded economic growth.Does he really? He didn’t several years ago.Where is the evidence he knows how to lead the government to create jobs? He has never held office.Again, to claim the government has never helped economic development in this country is a ridiculous statement.We have never been a country that refused to help the downtrodden. Why did some of the colonial states call themselves commonwealths?He is running for office; he is now a politician.This lacks any nuance. Our businesses have virtually invited them here; they are not the only guilty parties.As do we all.They are rigorously vetted. Turning them away would be a very un-Christian act. Of course he is. Aren’t we all?Then I look forward to his repudiation of his tax cut plan.We know he does; he brags about playing his role in corrupting it.She is a big player in our political system.
I will respond, point by point. All office holders and would be office holders claim to support the rule of law; most don’t bribe attorneys general.I’ve never heard anyone claim to support trade deals that do not favor the US; whether the deal is good for us or not can be determined only in the future.We are the superpower; supporting other countries that cannot pay us back is frequently in our national interest. What if you are too sick, poor, or just in a run of really bad luck? Forget about them?Does that include endless occupation, or just finding out if the sand can glow? A very simplistic argument.So, we explode the deficit or cut massively. I anxiously await his delineation of the cuts.It is intuitively obviously to even a dim observer that the government has a tremendous impact on the economy, and it can be for good or ill. Does he believe government ALWAYS impedes economic growth? That would imply he knows very little history. It is true, of course, that the recent republican growth has greatly impeded economic growth.Does he really? He didn’t several years ago.Where is the evidence he knows how to lead the government to create jobs? He has never held office.Again, to claim the government has never helped economic development in this country is a ridiculous statement.We have never been a country that refused to help the downtrodden. Why did some of the colonial states call themselves commonwealths?He is running for office; he is now a politician.This lacks any nuance. Our businesses have virtually invited them here; they are not the only guilty parties.As do we all.They are rigorously vetted. Turning them away would be a very un-Christian act. Of course he is. Aren’t we all?Then I look forward to his repudiation of his tax cut plan.We know he does; he brags about playing his role in corrupting it.She is a big player in our political system.
Ok, come back at me.