“Decide in haste repent at leisure.” seems appropriate for those in the political flashmob that thought to vote for someone to dismantle establishment government policies was a good idea. The time has come to repair the mess the Woodward’s book is exposing. The Internet doesn’t discriminate between good and bad ideas but amplifies their intensity and promotes reactive rather than thoughtful decision making. Maybe Gen-Y and Gen-Z (who are inheriting the bulk of the debt the Boomers/Gen-X incurred) won’t make important policy decisions on a WTA (winner take all) reactive emotional basis as they’ve grown up with instant communications, are better informed and more skeptical of what they see and hear.
“Decide in haste repent at leisure.” seems appropriate for those in the political flashmob that thought to vote for someone to dismantle establishment government policies was a good idea. The time has come to repair the mess the Woodward’s book is exposing. The Internet doesn’t discriminate between good and bad ideas but amplifies their intensity and promotes reactive rather than thoughtful decision making. Maybe Gen-Y and Gen-Z (who are inheriting the bulk of the debt the Boomers/Gen-X incurred) won’t make important policy decisions on a WTA (winner take all) reactive emotional basis as they’ve grown up with instant communications, are better informed and more skeptical of what they see and hear.